SoSOL Wargames

28 January 2010

  • HC reports: usability bug: if I just want to add a translation, I can't do it from the screen that show up when I start emending; can't get option to create until xml has been modified

1200EST 27 January 2010

  • HC edited O. Berenike 1.1
    • JS and JC voted yes-text, RA voted reject
    • HC sees two notifications of approval, instead of just one
    • it showed up for finalization on James' dashboard and he went ahead and finalized/committed
    • successfully canonized
  • HC created new translation for O Berenike 1 5
    • James and Josh voted for the translation; Rodney did not get option to vote and then Rodney was assigned as finalizer

stray notes

  • Front page
    • Create publication from PN ID: is this superseded by "Emend existing publicaiton" + dropdowns?
  • Delete tweaks
    • news feed: include what got deleted in news feed
  • Bug in boards set-up
    • need to make sure RA, JC, JS are on editorial board
    • need to make sure RA, JC, JS are super-editors
    • not displaying board members' names
    • TE submitted edits to BGU 1.197 before board was set up; text remains 'submitted' but is sort of in limbo
  • TE submitted an emendation
    • A note did go to the editorial board and the item was added to the queue
    • But TE got an error message
      • Home does not say that a document has been submitted
      • Your editing publications
        • contains 2 entries for same document
          • first doc allows you to see and edit text
            • but you cannot submit: not enough privs
          • click second doc: "we're sorry something went wrong"
    • And When EB member clicked on item in queue also a error message
      • Also when EB clicks stack of papers "submit" button appears at top
  • When EB members edit, save, and submit, the submitted text does not get added to the DDBDP Editorial Board Publications queue
  • In DDBDP Editorial Board Publications would be best to display
    • # BGU 11 2055 # Hgv BGU XI 2055, submitted by Fred Smith on 01/15/1020

20 Jan 2010 0900EST

  • who initiated a text must be indicated on editors'
  • full implementation of delete when? CC says can't be done by 1 Feb and that it's under-specified
  • something funny happens when you open a text then, without changing, click home?
  • board superdude tried to edit an existing decree throws a "something went wrong" error should be fixed with 5a4e1b796356a9c3dd33524c8382ff52241f83dd
  • board member on vote page, pulled down graffiti but didn't put anything in the text box, threw a "something happened" error rather than catching the empty field and demanding (or graying out button until there's a comment in there)
  • incorrect chunking of texts with multiple divs is still causing trouble
    • James would like a visual cue (text) indicating that text is required
    • (was voting "grafitti") error seems to be unrelated to existence or not of text in the voting justification box
    • trying to trap:
      • Hugh submits a text (O. Berenike 1 1)
        • all 3 editors vote "yes" (successfully)
        • trigger didn't fire for approve
      • Hugh submits another text (BGU 1 4)
        • all 3 editors vote "no"
          • Josh got a proxy error (Glassfish flakiness); others voted successfully; Josh voted successfully on a second try
          • not showing approve, just like the previous one
      • Hugh submits another text (O. Berenike 1 2)
        • all 3 editors vote "defer" (successfully)
          • again not showing approve
      • Hugh submits another text (O. Berenike 1 3)
        • all 3 editors vote "reject" (successfully)
          • it returned to Hugh, but doesn't give the reasons for rejections; gives Hugh the vote box (Hugh will get a screen capture)
      • Hugh submits another text (O. Berenike 1 4)
        • all 3 editors vote "graffiti"
          • on clicking "vote" got a "we're sorry something went wrong" error
          • Ryan says there's a problem with finishing notification after deleting the object
          • once the object is deleted other delete votes will error off
      • Hugh submits O. Berenike 1 5
        • Josh voted "yes", Rodeny and james voted "no"
        • Rodney got a message: "the change you wanted is rejected"
        • but now votes reflect results
          • don't see finalization step, as expected
      • Hugh tried resubmitting O. Berenike 1 3
        • all editors get the option to vote
        • why are editors seeing the earlier attempt still on their DDBDP editorial board publications list?
          • when stuff is sent back like that, it should disappear from the Board's work list
        • it's still showing up in Hugh's "editing publications" list, even though it's been resubmitted; it's also showing up on his submitted list
        • Josh produced the same error, but not on resubmit; seems to be doing it all along
    • JOSH opened BGU 1 129, edited, saved and submitting but when he reopens it via the link in "your editing publications" and "ddbdp editorial board publications" link it fails with "error at line 1, column 10; Ryan says there's no content on that branch of the repository, will need to look at in more detail to see when/how got lost
    • if you submit an emendation to text X, you may not check out and submit a separate emendation to same text until original proposal has been acted upon (but of course you can make multiple proposals in a single submissions)
    • editors want bigger comments, preferably: long, multi-line comments, rather than 256 characters
    • defer looking at "finalization" step until the post-vote action bug is fixed
    • Gabby tried to make BGU 1 70 (stray square bracket; said error line 22, column 113, which means nothing with no line numbers in the xml)
      • we either need line numbers or some other way to tell us what we need
      • error disappears too quickly
      • GB found the error, fixed it then hit Leiden plus, it still said there was an error and the square bracket had come back; do we need to save before switching from XML to Leiden plus view? If so (yes) it would be good to be told that; saving it says "we're sorry something went wrong"
        • behavior: editor should take you to the xml view directly if the leiden plus is not parsing
  • HGV testing
    • after board member votes, view defaults back to text, rather than metadata
  • editors would like a way to discover/see each other's vote reasons

22 Jan 2010 1220EST

  • HC edited O.Berenike I 2
    • All 3 voted yesText (News feed recorded 4 votes tho only 3 were cast)
      • JC got no notice in "Your Finalizing"
      • JS got notice, but link produces error
      • RB got notice, but link produces error
  • CC edited P.Louvre I 11
    • 1 voted yesText, 1 YesApp?, 1 reject (News feed recorded 2 votes tho only 3 were cast)
      • JC got no notice in "Your Finalizing"
      • JS got no notice
      • RB got notice, but link produces error
  • RB thinks problem is with finalize view
  • HC edited O.Berenike I 4
    • JC and JS voted Reject
      • NEws Feed says was rejected
      • HC: Text has not been returned to his Editing Publicaitons list
      • JC and JS still have the text in DDbDP Editorial Board list, tho it should vanish, since it was rejected

29 Jan 2010

  • RB submitted P.Lond. 7 2067
    • JS voted NO
    • JC voted YES
    • When RA voted NO he was told "We're sorry, but something went wrong."
  • Tried again with O.Ber. I 8
    • JS votes NO
    • JC votes No and gets error
    • Seems to be that second Reject Vote chokes
  • Tried again with O.Ber. I 9
    • JS voted Trash: "We're sorry..."
    • Seems like variation on previous

3 Feb 2010

  • Problem rendering diff in finalizing of Ddb BGU 1 2 / Ddb BGU 1 46 / Ddb Chrest.Mitt. 113 / Hgv BGU I 2 / Hgv SoSOL MMX 4